Rethinking Hostility: Perspectives from Turkey, West Africa, and North America
Since I grew up in Turkey, I am accustomed to assessing concepts like hostility through the lens of a collectivist culture. Glenn Adams’ research, which explores diverse perceptions of hostility in West Africa and North America, reveals significant similarities with our own cultural context. Concurrently, it has prompted me to consider new ways we manage hostility.
Turkey and West Africa: The Influence of Collectivist Values
The attitude in West Africa toward hostility as an inherent aspect of life aligns closely with our cultural perspective. In Turkey, individuals seek methods to navigate this reality, especially in contexts of familial systems, neighborhood dynamics, or the business environment, rather than attempting to eradicate conflicts entirely.
- Societal Role: Similar to the situation in West Africa, hostility is perceived as a communal issue rather than one that is solely individual. Particularly, family elders or community leaders play a pivotal role in mediating disputes. Concepts like “making peace” and “mediation” are deeply ingrained in our society.
- Communal Bonds: Hostility is viewed as a chance to mend relationships rather than a complete disconnection between people.
This mindset, I feel, not only alleviates personal stress but also fortifies social connections. Nevertheless, it’s important to acknowledge that at times we struggle with maintaining personal boundaries.
The Distant Perspective of North America
I would say that the individualistic mindset prevalent in North America seems foreign to me, yet after spending considerable time there, I have grown accustomed to it. Individuals view hostility as a risk to their personal space and typically prefer to avoid it. This reflection led me to ponder, “Could such a thing occur within our culture?” This question has occupied my thoughts throughout my years in America.
Perhaps as a result of urbanization’s emphasis on individuality, distancing behaviors are becoming more common in our society. However, many still opt for resolving conflicts through direct communication or with the guidance of family elders. The approach of confronting and addressing hostility in Turkey, particularly within longstanding familial structures and rural areas, remains a vital practice.
Avoidance or Engagement with Hostility?
In comparing both methods with my cultural background, one aspect stands out clearly: entirely evading or disregarding hostility plays a minimal role in our relationships. However, it is essential to recognize the richness that confrontation and the pursuit of collective solutions contribute to our connections.
Yet, as someone who was raised in a collectivist culture, I also find myself contemplating the following questions:
- How long can I maintain my personal boundaries?
- Am I genuinely capable of voicing my thoughts in conflict situations, or do I tend to remain silent to preserve community harmony?
Hostility in Turkey: A Challenge or a Reality?
This article has prompted me to reflect on the idea of hostility from a new perspective. Within a collectivist culture such as Turkey’s, hostility represents not just a threat but also an undeniable reality. Accepting this truth within our relationships and developing strategies to navigate it is a crucial element of our society.
Drawing inspiration from West Africa, we can further understand this situation on a deeper level. However, it might also be beneficial to learn from the individual demarcation strategies observed in North America. Achieving balance may be the most effective approach in addressing hostility.
Leave a Reply